Sampling of court cases involving the Fairfax County Police



Legal actions involving the Fairfax Police
1. King v. Wallace, No. 80-503., SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, 451 U.S. 969; 101 S. Ct. 2045; 68 L. Ed. 2d 348; 1981 U.S. LEXIS 1933; 49 U.S.L.W. 3824, May 4, 1981
2. King v. Wallace, No. 80-503., SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, 449 U.S. 1008; 101 S. Ct. 562; 66 L. Ed. 2d 466; 1980 U.S. LEXIS 4079; 49 U.S.L.W. 3409, December 1, 1980
3. Culosi v. Bullock, No. 09-1042, No. 09-1104, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, 596 F.3d 195; 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 3553, October 28, 2009, Argued, February 22, 2010, Decided
4. Satti v. Simenson, No. 05-2013 , UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, 161 Fed. Appx. 246; 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 29156, November 28, 2005, Submitted , December 30, 2005, Decided , RULES OF THE FOURTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS MAY LIMIT CITATION TO UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS. PLEASE REFER TO THE RULES OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THIS CIRCUIT.
5. Redditt v. Virginia, No. 05-1912 , UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, 158 Fed. Appx. 491; 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 28845, December 22, 2005, Submitted , December 28, 2005, Decided , RULES OF THE FOURTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS MAY LIMIT CITATION TO UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS. PLEASE REFER TO THE RULES OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THIS CIRCUIT. , US Supreme Court certiorari denied by Redditt v. Virginia, 2006 U.S. LEXIS 6475 (U.S., Oct. 2, 2006)
6. Parrish v. Cleveland, No. 02-2306, No. 02-2307, No. 02-2308 , UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, 372 F.3d 294; 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 12033, October 30, 2003, Argued , June 18, 2004, Decided
7. Redditt v. Fairfax County Pub. Schs, No. 03-1440 , UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, 80 Fed. Appx. 833; 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 23091, October 15, 2003, Submitted , November 12, 2003, Decided , RULES OF THE FOURTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS MAY LIMIT CITATION TO UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS. PLEASE REFER TO THE RULES OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THIS CIRCUIT. , Subsequent appeal at Redditt v. Wade, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 11138 (4th Cir. Va., May 4, 2006)
8. Bazarov v. Hulse, No. 01-1070, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, 21 Fed. Appx. 158; 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 22958, October 18, 2001, Submitted , October 25, 2001, Decided , RULES OF THE FOURTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS MAY LIMIT CITATION TO UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS. PLEASE REFER TO THE RULES OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THIS CIRCUIT.
9. Freyesleben v. County of Fairfax, No. 00-2025, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, 2 Fed. Appx. 377; 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 1097, January 16, 2001, Submitted , January 26, 2001, Decided , RULES OF THE FOURTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS MAY LIMIT CITATION TO UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS. PLEASE REFER TO THE RULES OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THIS CIRCUIT. , Reported in Table Case Format at: 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 6707.
10. Freyesleben v. County of Fairfax, No. 00-2025, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, 243 F.3d 537; 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 6707, January 16, 2001, Submitted , January 26, 2001, Decided , DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION , Certiorari Denied October 1, 2001, Reported at: 2001 U.S. LEXIS 5635.
11. Doe v. Broderick, No. 99-1893, No. 99-1894, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, 225 F.3d 440; 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 22165, January 25, 2000, Argued , August 29, 2000, Decided
12. Williams v. Vorbau, No. 99-2429, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, 211 F.3d 1267; 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 7742, March 28, 2000, Submitted , April 25, 2000, Decided , RULES OF THE FOURTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS MAY LIMIT CITATION TO UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS. PLEASE REFER TO THE RULES OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THIS CIRCUIT.
13. Thompson v. Board of Trustees of the Fairfax County Police Officers Retirement Sys. (In re Thompson), No. 95-3112, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, 92 F.3d 1182; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 28049, July 8, 1996, Argued , August 2, 1996, Decided , RULES OF THE FOURTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS MAY LIMIT CITATION TO UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS. PLEASE REFER TO THE RULES OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THIS CIRCUIT.
14. Thompson v. Board of Trustees (In re Thompson), No. 95-3112, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 19051, July 8, 1996, Argued , August 2, 1996, Decided , RULES OF THE FOURTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS MAY LIMIT CITATION TO UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS. PLEASE REFER TO THE RULES OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THIS CIRCUIT. , Reported in Table Case Format at: 92 F.3d 1182, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 28049.
15. Patterson v. County of Fairfax, No. 95-2386, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, 89 F.3d 829; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 34498, March 26, 1996, Submitted , June 26, 1996, Decided , RULES OF THE FOURTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS MAY LIMIT CITATION TO UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS. PLEASE REFER TO THE RULES OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THIS CIRCUIT.
16. Patterson v. County of Fairfax, No. 95-2386, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 15391, March 26, 1996, Submitted , June 26, 1996, Decided , RULES OF THE FOURTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS MAY LIMIT CITATION TO UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS. PLEASE REFER TO THE RULES OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THIS CIRCUIT. , Reported in Table Case Format at: 89 F.3d 829, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 34498.
17. Patterson v. County of Fairfax, No. 94-1218, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, 45 F.3d 427; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 5851, November 1, 1994, Argued , January 4, 1995, Decided , RULES OF THE FOURTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS MAY LIMIT CITATION TO UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS. PLEASE REFER TO THE RULES OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THIS CIRCUIT.
18. Patterson v. County of Fairfax, No. 94-1218, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 70, November 1, 1994, Argued , January 4, 1995, Decided , RULES OF THE FOURTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS MAY LIMIT CITATION TO UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS. PLEASE REFER TO THE RULES OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THIS CIRCUIT. , Reported in Table Case Format at: 45 F.3d 427, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 5851.
19. Palmai v. Gilbert K. Davis & Assocs., No. 94-1700, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 31393, October 18, 1994, Submitted , November 10, 1994, Decided , RULES OF THE FOURTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS MAY LIMIT CITATION TO UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS. PLEASE REFER TO THE RULES OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THIS CIRCUIT. , Reported in Table Case Format at: 43 F.3d 1467, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 40044.
20. Palmai v. Gilbert K. Davis & Assocs., No. 94-1700, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, 43 F.3d 1467; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 40044, October 18, 1994, Submitted , November 10, 1994, Decided , RULES OF THE FOURTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS MAY LIMIT CITATION TO UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS. PLEASE REFER TO THE RULES OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THIS CIRCUIT.
21. Miller v. Nida, No. 91-1253, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 4651, February 4, 1993, Argued , March 9, 1993, Decided , RULES OF THE FOURTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS MAY LIMIT CITATION TO UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS. PLEASE REFER TO THE RULES OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THIS CIRCUIT.
22. Traverso v. Penn, Nos. 87-6043, 87-6044, 87-6055, 87-6069, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, 874 F.2d 209; 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 6412, December 5, 1988, Argued , May 10, 1989, Decided
23. Kidd v. O'Neill, No. 86-6599, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, 804 F.2d 1250; 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 33366, November 10, 1986, Decided , RULES OF THE FOURTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS MAY LIMIT CITATION TO UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS. PLEASE REFER TO THE RULES OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THIS CIRCUIT.
24. Traverso v. Belew, No. 86-7528, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, 791 F.2d 926; 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 18736, June 3, 1986 , UNPUBLISHED OPINION]
25. Snitkoff v. Fairfax County Police Dep't, No. 86-7505, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, 790 F.2d 889; 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 18849, May 21, 1986 , UNPUBLISHED OPINION]
26. Kidd v. O'Neil, No. 83-6556, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, 774 F.2d 1252; 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 23719, July 13, 1984, Argued , September 23, 1985
27. Jurgensen v. Fairfax County, Nos. 82-2153 (L), 83-1500, 83-1646, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, 745 F.2d 868; 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 17956, December 8, 1983, Argued , October 4, 1984
28. Hughes v. Blankenship, No. 80-1427, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS, FOURTH CIRCUIT, 672 F.2d 403; 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 21303, November 3, 1981, Argued , March 3, 1982, Decided
29. Wallace v. King, Nos. 80-1657, 80-1658, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS, FOURTH CIRCUIT, 650 F.2d 529; 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 12569, March 4, 1981, Argued , June 5, 1981, Decided
30. Wallace v. King, No. 78-1399, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS, FOURTH CIRCUIT, 626 F.2d 1157; 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 16066, October 4, 1979, Reargued , July 1, 1980, Decided
31. Northern Virginia Women's Medical Center v. Balch, Nos. 78-1673, 78-1674, 79-1161, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS, FOURTH CIRCUIT, 617 F.2d 1045; 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 19612, November 7, 1979, Argued , March 14, 1980, Decided
32. Vinnedge v. Gibbs, No. 74-2021, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT, 550 F.2d 926; 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 10650, April 6, 1976, Argued , January 6, 1977, Decided
33. Thompson v. Board of Trustees of the Fairfax County Police Officers Retirement Sys. (In re Thompson), Case No. 93-15316-AB, Chapter 7, Adversary Proceeding No. 94-1045, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA, ALEXANDRIA DIVISION, 182 B.R. 140; 1995 Bankr. LEXIS 703; 33 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d (MB) 1191, May 23, 1995, Decided
34. Newton v. Fairfax County Police Dep't, Record No. 991124, SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA, 259 Va. 801; 529 S.E.2d 794; 2000 Va. LEXIS 80, April 21, 2000, Decided
35. Bonavita v. Board of Trustees, Record No. 850912, Supreme Court of Virginia, 236 Va. 31; 372 S.E.2d 366; 1988 Va. LEXIS 118; 5 Va. Law Rep. 469, September 23, 1988
36. Hailman v. Fairfax County Police Pension Board, Record No. 4566, Supreme Court of Virginia, 198 Va. 311; 94 S.E.2d 281; 1956 Va. LEXIS 208, September 4, 1956
37. Newton v. Fairfax County Police Department/Fairfax County Bd. of Supervisors, Record No. 1672-98-4, COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA, 1999 Va. App. LEXIS 242, April 27, 1999, Decided , PURSUANT TO THE APPLICABLE VIRGINIA CODE SECTION THIS OPINION IS NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION.
38. Fowler v. Fairfax County Police Officers Ret. Sys., Chancery No. 169977 , CIRCUIT COURT OF FAIRFAX COUNTY, VIRGINIA, 57 Va. Cir. 553; 2000 Va. Cir. LEXIS 519, December 21, 2000, Issued
39. Fowler v. Fairfax County Police Officers Ret. Sys., Chancery No. 169977 , CIRCUIT COURT OF FAIRFAX COUNTY, VIRGINIA, 57 Va. Cir. 553; 2000 Va. Cir. LEXIS 518, December 14, 2000, Issued , Fowler v. Fairfax County, 2000 Va. Cir. LEXIS 519 (Dec. 21, 2000)
40. Thompson v. Board of Trustees Police Officers Retirement Sys., Chancery No. 140445, CIRCUIT COURT OF FAIRFAX COUNTY, VIRGINIA, 1995 Va. Cir. LEXIS 1390, December 12, 1995, Decided
41. Dove v. Boseman, Case No. (Law) 93845, CIRCUIT COURT OF FAIRFAX COUNTY, VIRGINIA, 27 Va. Cir. 55; 1991 Va. Cir. LEXIS 357, December 30, 1991