February
4, 1994: Yet again, a court ruled with a man who said that the evidence used
against him by the arresting officer's, under the circumstances, was not a
particularized and objective basis for subjecting the driver to a stop of a
car. The judge ruled that the stop was not consistent with Fourth Amendment
principles and that the Defendant's car was not violating the law before it was
stopped by the officer so the constitutionality of the stop was not reasonable.